My Philosophical Development
Material type:
TextPublication details: London UNWIN PaperbackDescription: 207p. 21 cmISBN: - 9780041920307
- B 1649 RUS 1959
| Cover image | Item type | Current library | Home library | Collection | Shelving location | Call number | Materials specified | Vol info | URL | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | Item hold queue priority | Course reserves | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Books | Ziauddin School & College Library On Shelve | Non Fiction | B 1649 RUS 1959 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 61 EDU |
Browsing Ziauddin School & College Library shelves,Shelving location: On Shelve,Collection: Non Fiction Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
|
|
|
|
|
No cover image available |
|
||
| LB. 1731. HAR. 1992 Understanding teacher development | LB.1731 HAR 1992 Understanding Teacher Development | LC. 94. SID. 2016 Education Policies In Pakistan: politics,projections,and practices | B 1649 RUS 1959 My Philosophical Development | BP 161 SHE 2013 The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam | BP 1 ISM 2015 Seerat Un Nabi Ka Khususi Mutala | BP 80 BUR 2001 AL-DAI AL-FATIMI Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin: an illustrated biography |
Includes Index
Russell gives an account of his philosophical development. He describes his Hegelian period and includes hitherto unpublished notes for a Hegelian philosophy of science. He deals next with the two-fold revolution involved with his abandonment of idealism and adoption of a mathematical logic founded upon that of Giuseppe Peano. After two chapters on Principia Mathematica (1910-1913), he passes to the problems of perception as dealt with in Our Knowledge of the External World (1914). In a chapter on ‘The Impact of Wittgenstein’, Russell examines what he now thinks must be accepted and what rejected in that philosopher's work. He notes the changes from earlier theories required by the adoption of William James's view that sensation is not essentially relational and is not per se a form of knowledge. In an explanatory chapter, he endeavors to remove misconceptions of and objections to his theories as to the relation of perception to scientific knowledge. Russell concludes with a reprint of some articles on modern Oxford philosophy.
There are no comments on this title.
